SDT: Marco Dellapina
The SDT ordered that the respondent should pay a fine of £3,750, and further that he should be subject to conditions.
View ArticleSDT: Peter Craig Atkinson
The SDT ordered that the respondent should be suspended from practice as a solicitor for 12 months to commence on 20 January 2016.
View ArticleSDT: Respondent I (name redacted)
The SDT granted the applicant’s application for the determination of the indefinite suspension imposed on him on 13 October 2011.
View ArticleSDT: Andrew John Taylor
The SDT ordered that the respondent should be struck off the roll.
View ArticleSDT: Stephen Allan Lawson
The SDT ordered that the respondent should be struck off the roll.
View ArticleSDT: Daniel Lloyd Williams
The SDT ordered that the respondent should be subject to several conditions.
View ArticleSolicitor who faked documents for self-preservation struck off
Matthew Charles Curtis fabricated documents 'to buy time to satisfy a difficult client'.
View ArticleSDT: Kamran Adil and Paul Ifeanyi Okafor Iwezulu
The SDT ordered that the first respondent (granted registered foreign lawyer status in 2012) should be struck off the Register of Foreign Lawyers. The SDT ordered that the second respondent (admitted...
View ArticleSDT: Huseyin Arslan
The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal ordered that the application of the appellant for revocation of a section 43 order made by the Solicitors Regulation Authority should be granted with effect from 11...
View ArticleTribunal increases solicitors’ punishment after SRA appeal
Matter was returned to the SDT last September after the divisional court agreed the case should be reheard.
View Article‘Rehabilitated’ ex-solicitor denied readmission
'Highly commendable' progress does not count as an 'exceptional circumstance', disciplinary tribunal rules.
View ArticleSDT: Edward Hugh Johnson and Harry Naughton
The SDT ordered that the first respondent should be struck off the roll; and that the second respondent should pay a fine of £1,000.
View ArticleSDT: Nicholas Marray
The SDT ordered that the respondent should be struck off the roll.
View ArticleSDT: David Michael Merrick
The SDT ordered that the respondent should be struck off the roll.
View ArticleSDT: Konstantinos Adamantopoulos
The SDT was satisfied that it was necessary and proportionate to make a section 43 order against the respondent. His misconduct in relation to billing and attempting to bill his clients for his...
View ArticleSDT: Respondent J
The SDT ordered that the application for revocation of a section 43 order imposed on the applicant should be granted.
View ArticleTribunal ‘appalled’ after SRA’s late deal with charged solicitor
SDT says it was ‘baffled’ as to why the regulator had not tried to obtain a witness statement from a key figure.
View Article